tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post3330023725385072970..comments2023-05-11T04:57:33.365-07:00Comments on Trees For Lunch: Coakley vs. Brown: The Fine PrintUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-11414206560558431222010-01-26T10:08:59.259-08:002010-01-26T10:08:59.259-08:00It's funny... no matter what your political st...It's funny... no matter what your political stance, everyone agrees our government is wrong. It could be Democrats or Republicans in power, no one is happy with what we get. I'm going to have to go with Lord Edward Cecil on this one:<br /><br />"Compromise: And agreement between two men to do what both agree is wrong."Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02504734487692109101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-80910970819679423652010-01-24T05:33:16.880-08:002010-01-24T05:33:16.880-08:00Geenks is 100% correct about us electing who we li...Geenks is 100% correct about us electing who we like the best, not who leads us the best. I wish I would have thought of that. And I'll be using that line first chance I get.<br /><br />Thanks old buddy!<br /><br />feenofeenohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07483769284197614547noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-32553101027429629882010-01-22T17:02:40.171-08:002010-01-22T17:02:40.171-08:00It comes down to the simple problem of democracy: ...It comes down to the simple problem of democracy: we elect who we like, not who can lead us best. The fact is, we should be able to produce people who are both, but we've let ourselves down for a long time.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02504734487692109101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-24091272917304891682010-01-21T16:52:48.322-08:002010-01-21T16:52:48.322-08:00To me it seemed like the democrrat party in Mass. ...To me it seemed like the democrrat party in Mass. had an attitude like.....<br /><br />"She's been around a long time. She says all of the right things. She's been supportive in the past. Let's go with her."<br /><br />Hindsight is always 20-20 but I agree with your "cold and stand-offish" assessment. Check out this <a href="http://www.redcounty.com/massachussets" rel="nofollow">link</a>. Especially the picture at the bottom> I think this did more ham to her campaign then she realizes.J Curtishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12746127431922685446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-28050215980216449622010-01-21T07:48:12.704-08:002010-01-21T07:48:12.704-08:00You give voters credit for having intelligence tha...You give voters credit for having intelligence that not even you possess, JD. The fact is she was cold and stand-offish, and her lack of knowledge regarding Red Sox baseball was more of a factor than Obama, healthcare, gay marriage, or Brown's choice in vehicle.<br /><br />I would be more than happy to bet money he does not win re-election, which I believe will be in less than six years (since he is stepping in mid-term).Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02504734487692109101noreply@blogger.com