tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post9001775499273708321..comments2023-05-11T04:57:33.365-07:00Comments on Trees For Lunch: The so-called 'Hiddenness of God' Part II: Dispatches from an intellectually-dicey atheistUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-29751067709114059842011-12-03T14:45:50.023-08:002011-12-03T14:45:50.023-08:00He really does have a problem With the definition ...He really does have a problem With the definition of simple words. He also likes to make them upTheological Discoursehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11215794691420472061noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-80947507528061694102011-12-02T07:31:33.449-08:002011-12-02T07:31:33.449-08:00Just so we're clear here JV..
You write an en...Just so we're clear here JV..<br /><br />You write an entire article about the so-called 'hiddennness of God' without once ever mentioning the word 'coercion'.<br /><br />I bring up the topic, define the word 'coercion' and ask if it applies in this case using the dictionary definition of the word coercion.<br /><br />You submit various paragraphs of tripe and never once analyse the specifically-defined word 'coercion' in the context of the possible outcome of God revealing himslf in an unmistakeable manner.<br /><br />Am I somehow wrong in this summary? If so, how?J Curtishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12746127431922685446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-44128846022393938712011-12-01T20:49:45.240-08:002011-12-01T20:49:45.240-08:00I must admit, Ms. Woodcock if giving you a run for...I must admit, Ms. Woodcock if giving you a run for your money. This is just classic.<br /><br /><i>"I really do not understand why he tagged me. I had nothing to do with it</i><br /><br />Woodcock, you seem quite content in criticizing others in a forum in which they cannot defend themselves. At least here, you can defend your intellectual laziness, which is a luxury that Justin seems determined to deny.J Curtishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12746127431922685446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-13173673545788639962011-12-01T20:37:20.481-08:002011-12-01T20:37:20.481-08:00Please explain to me why the above question cannot...Please explain to me why the above question cannot be answered either yes or no. especially since the way it is presented, it requires either yes or no. <br /><br />I'll tell you what, cut and paste the answer you gave which dealt with whether such an appearance would amount to coercion or not and we'll examine it. Fair enough?J Curtishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12746127431922685446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4434842591971703006.post-82259523385152691582011-12-01T15:04:09.064-08:002011-12-01T15:04:09.064-08:00I laugh. I have said, multiple times, that questio...I laugh. I have said, multiple times, that questions can't always be answered with a simple 'yes' or 'no.'<br /><br />I blocked you because you kept hijacking discussions, insisting that I respond with a 'yes' or 'no' when it's not feasible, and levying personal attacks against persons on my page (as you continue to do so here).Justin Vaculahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05167284957169597725noreply@blogger.com