Where's the birth certificate

Free and Strong America

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Black Christian News 'Gets It'. Why Can't Others?

Buried within the text of President Obama's Fathers Day proclamation was the following rather interesting definition of fatherhood...

"Nurturing families come in many forms, and children may be raised by a father and mother, a single father, two fathers, a step-father, a grandfather, or caring guardian."

Tim Wildmon of the American Family Association points out that "This is the first time in our nation's history that a president has used Father's Day as an excuse to promote the radical homosexual agenda and completely redefine the word 'family,'" and to my knowledge, he is absolutely correct on that account. Black Christian News asks the following, probing question ...

"Question: Where are the Megachurch Pastors and Prophets of God to Publicly Rebuke this Unwise President?

Where is T.D. Jakes, Eddie Long, Charles Blake, Joel Hunter, Creflo Dollar, Charles Stanley, Noel Jones, Jack Graham, Pat Robertson, Kenneth Ulmer, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen and James Dobson? Where is Tony Evans, Frank Page, Al Sharpton, Kirbyjon Caldwell, Ed Young Sr., Ed Young Jr., Jonathan Falwell, Dwight McKissic, Jesse Jackson, Floyd Flake, Frederick Haynes III, David Jeremiah, and John Hagee? Where are the preachers and prophets who know that homosexuality is an abomination in God's sight and is also against nature itself, and that two homosexual men cannot be "fathers" in the normal sense of the word?"

Indeed, there seems to be an appalling lack of criticism from America's leading pastors in the wake of such shameless political manuevering by Obama. To be fair, although we are just a few short days after Father's Day, I really don't see many of the above mentioned Christian "leaders" launching criticisms at Obama's for politicizing Father's Day in such a way.

I'm sure Obama will make mention that children raised by gay parents are significantly more likely to become gay themselves along with statistics that bear out that....

  1. "Almost all child sexual abuse is committed by men; and

  2. Less than three percent of American men identify themselves as homosexual; yet

  3. Nearly a third of all cases of child sexual abuse are homosexual in nature (that is, they involve men molesting boys). This is a rate of homosexual child abuse about ten times higher than one would expect based on the first two facts."Link

The authors of the study go on to point out that "This does not mean that all, or even most, homosexual men are child molesters--but it does prove that homosexuality is a significant risk factor for this horrible crime" which seems like a pretty fair statement based upon the statistics provided.

All of this points toward a much less than optimal situation for children being raised in such an environment and for Obama to equate such couples with heterosexual ones is nothing short of "Orwellian verve".


Gregg said...

First of all, other than with the exception of one or two names, I wouldn't trust any of those aforementioned "pastors" and I use the term very loosely, the overwhelming majority are wolves who have invaded the sheeps fold, with any comment that they made. Does the Black Christian News think that men like Dollar, Jakes, Warren, Olsteen, Evans, Sharpton, or Jackson are even believers?

Second of all, why is anyone surprised Obama would make such a statement? As an unregenerate man, he has no ability to discern spritual things such as righteousness or unrighteousness, holy or wicked, or godly ongodly. He spoke from the wisdom of man which doesn't surprise me.

He is also a politician who wants what every first term president wants, a second term. As a result he must think politically and speak to the special interests that will help him be re-elected; God forbid.

I don't agree with him nor am I defending him, but the wolves usually won't weigh in on such issues as it might affect their next Mercedes purchase, or mansion mortgage, or 3K suit.

JD Curtis said...

Amen Gregg! I couldnt agree more! That they don't utter a peep speaks volumes concerning their personal beliefs and what they really stand for. One would be much better off supporting local churches/charities than these pretenders.

photogr said...

Don't blame me I didn't vote for the socialist radical hell bent on corruption the American way of life and it's values for his own gain (Obama).

Perhaps no one caught that because they are bored or tired of his blabber and ignore him. The other option is they might have supported his blabber. Either way, We need a new president in 2012.

SmartLX said...

How many of the abusers in #3 would have actually identified themselves as homosexual in #2? Not the priests, not the uncles, not the fathers, not the teachers...would it be more than a tenth of that third? If not, that's pretty consistent with the 3% in the general population.

The proportion of gay male perpetrators should be compared to the proportion of gay men, not the proportion of men who say they're gay. And then maybe we can talk about causes.

SmartLX said...

Oh, silly me. And then we can talk about the proportion of gay male perpetrators who are in or out of loving gay marriages or unions, and the possible preventative value of these when legitimised.

JD Curtis said...

How many of the abusers in #3 would have actually identified themselves as homosexual in #2?

From the Merriam Webster dictionary, "homosexual: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex"

If they are self-identified or not, it still falls within the same definition.

And then we can talk about the proportion of gay male perpetrators who are in or out of loving gay marriages or unions, and the possible preventative value of these when legitimised

Exactly how monogamous are gay couples on average?

SmartLX said...

If they are self-identified or not, it still falls within the same definition.

No objection there, but since a huge number of them don't self-identify (hence the "closet" as a huge social phenomenon) their actual proportion is a lot higher than 3%.

The thing of statistical importance in your piece is the comparison between that 3% and the third of known child abusers who abuse boys. That's never going to be a fair comparison because the abusers are all declared gay when they're caught.

Meanwhile your figures and assumptions themselves appear more doubtful the more I look into them. This piece has fairly straightforward analyses of the underlying research. Its conclusion:
"...the very scientists that are cited in support of the contention that gays are more likely to be molesters explicitly reject the idea that homosexuals pose a disproportionate threat to children. These scientists note that pedophilia is a separate orientation from homosexuality and that the vast majority of molesters who target boys have either no interest in mature males or are heterosexual men who are attracted to the feminine characteristics of pre-pubescent males."

Got that? Most of those who abuse boys do so in defiance of their clinically established tendency to direct sexual desire toward women. That is, very few of those who abuse boys are actually homosexual.

Exactly how monogamous are gay couples on average?

Not terribly, but this is often by agreement, and additional partners in public open relationships tend not to be children.

Flute said...


JD Curtis said...

Then why did male victims outnumber female victims by a ratio of about 2.3:1 (about 70%) in the recent Dublin abuse scandal? They secretly longed for a wife?

SmartLX said...

A woman in some sense, perhaps. That was a major outcome of the studies: the majority of people who rape boys are not trying to substitute for a grown man, but rather value the feminine characteristics of young boys. Bisexual and heterosexual men (usually with families of their own) are the primary perpetrators of homosexual paedophilia.

Straight men rape boys too.

JD Curtis said...

LX, the information is out there. Admittedly, it's not very easy to track down as it doesnt fit the agenda of the left dominated media.

"Overall, 26 (65%) of foster-parent perpetrators engaged in heterosexuality and 14 (35%) in homosexuality with their charges. Most molestation by foster-mothers was homosexual; most by foster- fathers heterosexual.
Virtually all studies indicate that homosexuals comprise between 2% to 4% of adults. Thus the figures above indicate a disproportionate amount of homosexual molestation" Link

"The Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) encourages teachers to organize and participate in GSA events. The group provides a web link that supplies educators with pro-LGBT resources. These include "gender liberation" coloring books; "gay" cartoon posters; and several posters challenging traditional views of gender. Teachers can download signs with inverted, rainbow-colored triangles proclaiming "Safe Zone" to put on their classroom door. They can also print off discussion kits on how to organize gender education sessions and start conversations about homosexuality with the children.

One poster, titled, "Things you can do to eradicate gender or multiply it exponentially," features cross-dressing, and has these suggestions:

• Think twice before you ask people if their child is a boy or a girl.

• Spend a day in drag.

• Refer to everyone by the incorrect pronoun.

• Challenge binary gender paradigms over Thanksgiving dinner.

• Hang out with children and teach them how to cross dress Barbie and G.I. Joe.

• Refuse to check off your sex when filling out forms."

Clearly, the homosexual movement's effort to recruit children has never been stronger than it is now." Link. How is this normal?

The International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology refers to homosexual pedophiles as a "distinct group." The victims of homosexual pedophiles "were more likely to be strangers, that they were more likely to have engaged in paraphiliac behavior separate from that involved in the offence, and that they were more likely to have past convictions for sexual offences. . . . Other studies [showed a] greater risk of reoffending than those who had offended against girls" and that the "recidivism rate for male-victim offenders is approximately twice that for female-victim offenders."

"A study in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that homosexual men are attracted to young males. The study compared the sexual age preferences of heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homosexual men, and lesbians. The results showed that, in marked contrast to the other three categories, "all but 9 of the 48 homosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories," which included males as young as age fifteen"

In The Gay Report, by homosexual researchers Karla Jay and Allen Young, the authors report data showing that 73 percent of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys sixteen to nineteen years of age or younger."

"Many pedophiles, in fact, consider themselves to be homosexual. A study of 229 convicted child molesters in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual." Link

JD Curtis said...

Ooops. It just got worse LX. Check it out...

"English professor Karla Jay, Ph.D., and well-educated journalist Allen Young, both homosexual activists, conducted the first major survey on homosexuality in America in 1979. Their work is still cited in academic studies and involved over 5,000 homosexuals from all walks of life. Titled "The Gay Report," the study published data on underage sex, disease, gross promiscuity, suicidal tendencies and more.

One cannot help but applaud the honesty of these two homosexuals in publishing the results of their study, which documented that "23 percent of respondents admitted to having had sex with youths aged 13-15, while 19 percent felt positive about sexual activity within this age group." Tragically, 50 percent of the males in their survey experienced their first sexual encounter at age 15 or less.

In spite of the fact that two gay researchers produced "The Gay Report," radical homosexual activists dismiss it as outdated. This is ironic considering they so often cite the much older 1948 "10 percent of society is gay" statistic from the oft-disputed Alfred Kinsey study.

But out of courtesy for their concerns, are there other esteemed elites drawing the same conclusions? Contrary to the homosexual assertion that heterosexual molestations outnumber those committed by homosexuals, Yale and Harvard-connected psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover states that "careful studies show that pedophilia is far more common among homosexuals than heterosexuals." Satinover adds, "The greater absolute number of heterosexual cases reflects the fact that heterosexual males outnumber homosexual males by approximately 36 to 1. Heterosexual child molestation cases outnumber homosexual cases by only 11 to 1, implying that pedophilia is more than three times more common among homosexuals."